Prospect and Markowitz Stochastic Dominance
نویسندگان
چکیده
Levy and Levy (2002, 2004) develop the Prospect and Markowitz stochastic dominance theory with S-shaped and reverse S-shaped utility functions for investors. In this paper, we extend Levy and Levy’s Prospect Stochastic Dominance theory (PSD) and Markowitz Stochastic Dominance theory (MSD) to the first three orders and link the corresponding S-shaped and reverse S-shaped utility functions to the first three orders. We also provide experiments to illustrate each case of the MSD and PSD to the first three orders and demonstrate that the higher order MSD and PSD cannot be replaced by the lower order MSD and PSD. Prospect theory has been regarded as a challenge to the expected utility paradigm. Levy and Levy (2002) prove that the second order PSD and MSD satisfy the expected utility paradigm. In our paper we take Levy and Levy’s results one step further by showing that both PSD and MSD of any order are consistent with the expected utility paradigm. Furthermore, we formulate some other properties for the PSD and MSD including the hierarchy that exists in both PSD and MSD relationships; arbitrage opportunities that exist in the first orders of both PSD and MSD; and that for any two prospects under certain conditions, their third order MSD preference will be ‘the opposite’ of or ‘the same’ as their counterpart third order PSD preference. By extending Levy and Levy’s work, we provide investors with more tools for empirical analysis, with which they can identify the first order PSD and MSD prospects and discern arbitrage opportunities that could increase his/her utility as well as wealth and set up a zero dollar portfolio to make huge profit. Our tools also enable investors to identify the third order PSD and MSD prospects and make better choices.
منابع مشابه
Stochastic Dominance and Decision Weights: Theory and Experiments
Based on recent theoretical and empirical results about the significance of Cumulative Prospect Theory (CPT), we define RWcSD, an extended notion of stochastic dominance that accounts for both the reflection effect (R) and the probability weighting (Wc). A second definition of stochastic dominance (R∗W -SD) for preferences with reverse reflection effect (R*) as in Markowitz (1952) is presented....
متن کاملTest Statistics for Prospect and Markowitz Stochastic Dominances with Applications
Levy and Levy (2002, 2004) and others extend the stochastic dominance (SD) theory for risk averters and risk seekers by developing the prospect SD (PSD) and Markowitz SD (MSD) theory for investors with S-shaped and reverse S-shaped utility functions. Davidson and Duclos (2000) and others develop an SD test for risk averters while Wong, et al. (2007) develop an SD test for risk seekers. In this ...
متن کاملDual stochastic dominance and quantile risk measures
Following the seminal work by Markowitz, the portfolio selection problem is usually modeled as a bicriteria optimization problem where a reasonable trade-off between expected rate of return and risk is sought. In the classical Markowitz model, the risk is measured with variance. Several other risk measures have been later considered thus creating the entire family of mean-risk (Markowitz type) ...
متن کاملModifying the Mean-Variance Approach to Avoid Violations of Stochastic Dominance
The mean-variance approach is an influential theory of decision under risk proposed by Markowitz (1952). Unfortunately, the mean-variance approach allows for violations of the first-order stochastic dominance. This paper proposes a new model in the spirit of the classical mean-variance approach but without violations of stochastic dominance. The proposed model represents preferences by a functi...
متن کاملDominance Violations and Event Splitting in Decision under Uncertainty
A standard requirement of rationality is that preferences obey stochastic dominance. In this paper, we investigate a new variety of dominance violation from the domain of uncertainty. We find that subjects systematically value a packed prospect, $x if one of two mutually exclusive events E1 or E2 obtains, less than an unpacked and dominated prospect, $x if E1 obtains, and $x−ε if E2 obtains. We...
متن کامل